Two teams meet in a moderated session with an experienced judge.
The structure looks like this:
- A coin toss decides which team begins.
- The judge presents the ethical question.
- One team delivers a 5 minute presentation explaining the position they find most defensible.
- The other team offers a 3 minute commentary, analysing and engaging with that reasoning.
- The first team has 3 minutes to respond.
- The judge then spends 7 minutes questioning the presenting team to probe and clarify their thinking.
- The roles are then reversed, so both teams present and respond.
Judges assess teams on the clarity, their critical thinking skills, their ability to respond respectfully, and collaboratively. The focus is on clear thinking and constructive engagement, not rhetorical point scoring.